Sonam Wangchuk Says Hunger Strike Ended to Protect Peaceful Protesters

Sonam Wangchuk said he ended his 26 day hunger strike only after receiving written assurances aimed at protecting peaceful protesters, rejecting claims that he reached any agreement with the Centre.

Social activist Sonam Wangchuk has dismissed allegations that he reached an understanding with the Centre before ending his 26 day hunger strike, saying his decision was driven solely by concerns over the safety of students and peaceful protesters.

In a video message released after concluding the fast, Wangchuk said he insisted on receiving a written assurance that participants in the protest would not face legal action. According to him, he decided to call off the agitation only after that assurance was provided.

He explained that growing concerns about the possibility of police action influenced his decision. Wangchuk said he wanted to prevent any situation that could put students or other demonstrators at risk and believed ending the fast could help reduce tensions.

Also read: Sonam Wangchuk Ends Indefinite Hunger Strike After Talks With Union Ministers

Responding to criticism over his decision, Wangchuk questioned suggestions that he had compromised with the government. He said a person willing to negotiate for personal gain would not have continued a hunger strike for nearly four weeks under difficult conditions.

The activist also alleged that after being shifted to a hospital, he faced restrictions on communication and movement. He claimed these conditions made it difficult to remain in contact with supporters and colleagues during the later stages of the protest.

Wangchuk said discussions with Union ministers primarily focused on safeguarding peaceful protesters from legal action, compensation for families of students who allegedly died following the NEET paper leak controversy, and the need for parliamentary discussion on examination reforms and accountability.

He added that he deliberately did not make the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan a condition for ending the fast because his immediate priority was ensuring that students participating in the movement did not face legal consequences.

While expressing disappointment that several supporters and public representatives could not be present when he concluded the fast, Wangchuk said the broader movement for examination reforms would continue through democratic means.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button